High-throughput phenotyping of cell cycle control in yeast

by | May 26, 2020 | News

Process automation was used to analyze the reproducibility of high-throughput phenotyping data of a library of cell cycle control mutants.

High-throughput phenotyping of cell cycle control in yeast

FORT COLLINS, Colo., May 26th, 2020 – A research team from Colorado State University, Virginia Tech and GenoFAB – a cloud computing company focused on high-throughput laboratory automation – have completed one of the largest quantitative experiments looking at the genetic control of cell growth and division in yeast. The high-throughput industrial-scale study, which looked at 630 interactions of 36 carefully selected cell-cycle genes (6589 mutants), was designed to build a more powerful mathematical model of cell cycle control and to establish principles for computer-aided experimental design of large-scale biological experiments. The work, which is published online in npj Systems Biology and Applications, drastically reduces the impact of poorly reproducible data arising from the study of large-scale biological systems.

By focusing their attention on the inner workings of yeast, scientists have made remarkable progress in learning how cells control cell division and growth. At the same time researchers have struggled to bring together the benefits of “going narrow and digging deep” (reductionism) and the less biased approach of “casting the net wide” (systems biology). To bridge this gap, researchers have used mathematical modeling but have been plagued by the constraints of data scarcity, poor data quality, and lack of reproducibility.

“The main challenge of this project, which took four years of intensive effort, was to bring an industrial mindset to the experimental design, study and data analysis of essential biological traits in more than 6000 yeast cell cycle mutants,” said Jean Peccoud, Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Colorado State University and founder of GenoFAB. “We deliberately chose to perform an unprecedented level of biological replicates to estimate the reproducibility of our own cell cycle regulation data and resolve discrepancies in previously published results.”

The researchers looked at synthetic lethal double mutants, a type of yeast mutant where the problems of reproducibility are particularly acute due to the inevitable errors of interpretation of very small differences in traits between some parent and daughter cells. Synthetic lethal mutations arise when viable yeast cells carrying deletions of two different genes are crossed to produce double-mutant cells that are unable to grow and survive.

Alex Hutagalung, Cofounder and Chief Scientific Officer of Levadura Biotechnology, who was not an author on the paper, remarked: “Synthetic lethality is never a straightforward phenotype and variability in large-scale screens often poses major challenges for researchers and modelers. It is essential that each interaction is always verified independently of the screen and it is impressive that this has been done with such rigor in these experiments.”

“The work described in this paper required a suite of instruments and software that could manage high-throughput measurements for microbial genetics in a way that would be fast, reliable and cost-effective at scale. Singer Instruments were delighted to support the Colorado State University use of our integrated ROTOR suite for genetic screening, our PhenoBooth colony analysis workstation, and our tetrad dissection solutions through all phases of this project,” said Harry Singer, Chief Executive Officer at Singer Instruments.

high-throughput phenotyping of cell cycle control mutants

Dr. Jenna Gallegos phenotyping one biological replicate of the cell cycle control library.

Process automation was foremost in our minds due to the scale of the undertaking,” said Mark Rogers, Director of Bioinformatics at GenoFAB. “Insightful statistical analysis demands proper planning up front: one needs to understand the nature of the data being measured before an experiment even starts.  We designed the data analysis work-flow in advance and mapped all the steps in the process before work began.”

“Our experimental set-up involved synthetic gene arrays that automate yeast genetic analysis. The protocol was built using the E-MAP workflow developed by Schuldiner and colleagues to generate and analyze comprehensive genetic-interaction maps,” said Neil Adames, joint first author on the study. “We more than doubled the replicates traditionally used in these methods and used a small number of traditional genetic crosses and comparisons to previously published work to resolve inconsistencies in replicates. This led to an improved list of high-confidence synthetic lethal mutations, which informed a new and improved version of a previously published model for the control of the cell cycle in yeast,” said Adames.

The advent of new technologies catapults science into new areas of discovery. The availability of powerful techniques like CRISPR means that even more cell size data can be collected and that data sets will increase by orders of magnitude.

“Our vision for future work is to focus further on ambitious large-scale experimental phenotyping to refine the preferred workflow and data analysis approaches that will cope with the increased availability of data,” says Peccoud. “It will not be possible to keep testing all the new data that will be part of the tsunami of future experimental biology but it should be possible to develop computer-guided experiments based on some of the most challenging scenarios like the synthetic lethal crosses described here.” The team anticipate extending this work to n-wise gene interactions instead of the pairwise interactions described in the present work.

“We think the process-oriented, model-driven experiments we are conducting to better understand cell division in yeast are useful going forward. They provide guiding principles that we can use to help other researchers adopt a high-throughput approach to other discovery and product development projects.”

*Gallegos, J.E., Adames, N.R., Rogers, M.F. et al. Genetic interactions derived from high-throughput phenotyping of 6589 yeast cell cycle mutants. npj Syst Biol Appl 6, 11 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41540-020-0134-z

Ready to automate your lab?

Take the first step on the road to higher productivity. 

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This